Inclusion within a public space has a multifaceted dimension, out of which inclusion of various users (individuals or groups), multiple age groups and different forms of activities that support them can be witnessed in all three spaces. The parks are designed to create opportunities for seating, walking and performing other activities individually or in groups throughout the site. The spaces can be reappropriated to fit the needs of the socially diverse visitors, developing forms of “sitting landscapes” as described by Jan Gehl, multipurpose elements within spaces designed to serve more than one purpose at the same time.[6] The spaces contain activities that target diverse age groups, welcoming multiple generations to interact and play within the public environment. The public spaces studied do account for inclusivity in their social context following Jan Gehl’s principles that spaces that invite a diversity of users help build a more inclusive and equitable community for all.[7] An inclusively designed park becomes a representation of the larger community, as it supports the relative activities that occur in their respective cultures. (Figure 4. Benches used to perform Yoga as an Exercise) The Aarey Bhaskar park has benches that are designed without backrests with more surface area to comfortably accommodate various sitting postures commonly performed by the users, for example, while doing Yoga Beyond human inclusion Aarey Bhaskar Park restricts the use of space to perform activities like walking the pets. This functionality of public space is differentiated from the parks in the Canadian context, (Figure 5. Types of Activities performed at Aarey Bhaskar park, Figure 6. Types of Activities performed at Twin Fork playground and Figure 7. Types of Activities performed at Bell park) since observations showed the inclusion of pets within public spaces is common and are very much a part of their culture too.